According to Robert Ameeti: > >On 2/23/03 10:33 AM, "John Griffin" <jwegriffin at mac.com> wrote: >> >>>Apple could have a Mac OS X/Windows dual booting machine on the >>>market and have the world once again beat a path to 1 Infinite >>>Loop. >> >>Apple has had them in the past and the world beat no such path. >> >>Shawn King > >C'mon Shawn. You know that machine was a dog waiting to be shot. >Create a machine that has some guts and the results could be >different. I don't know which Mac that was, that Shawn was referring to, although I remember the existence of it. However, I do remember, all too well, the existence of those "Orange" PC boards that jacked into the CPU [a daughterboard, maybe?] and gave the user a 286 or 386 to use, inside the Mac. VPC is cheaper and better. As well, by virtue of using VPC on a Mac, we can have a 95, 98, Win2k, and XP system ready to go,on one box, something that, as far as I know,can't be done with a PC, UNLESS it's running VPC for Windows. Not that I'd want to, but having 98, and Win2k, or XP,is actually useful. I tossed 98, but now run, albeit very infrequently, Win2kPro and XP, side-by-side with OSX jaguar. And yes, the previous Mac machine, dog or not, was a colossal failure as far as buyers were concerned. VPC, itself, has improved tremendously since VPC 4 [and previous releases]. ~flipper