On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Michael Bigley wrote: > >On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Michael Bigley wrote: > > > >> >Most market share numbers are based on *sales* not *in-use*. > > > >So? Ultimnately those new sales will translate into market share. > > > >> >Most in-use numbers show a 9-12% Macintosh usage share. Remember, most > >> >Wintel machines are purchased as replacements within a 12-18 month period. > >> > > >Even Macs don't last forever, and ultimately cn't run the latest Mac OS or > >carry enough "umph" to run the latest applications. > > > >> >The problem is that all these sales numbers assume that each machine is > >> >going into service as a new machine, not as a replacement for an existing > >> >machine. All that they say is that there are 97-99 Wintel > >>machines sold for > >> >every Macintosh sold. This does not equal "market share" in spite of those > > > >people who would like it to mean that. > > First, be careful on your auto quoting; I did not say the above... I didn't say that YOU said it - it was in your post - and I was relating to its contents. > Second, everyone is lamenting about this 2.3% number with no > substantiated facts! Has anyone actually confirmed this number to be > accurate... based on what? Sales reported to IDC? Isn't this numbers > from wholesalers? Does it include Apple Store (online and > brick/mortar)? IDC's numbers have traditionally been bogus and > biased when it comes to Apple. When the iMac was the leading > computer sold; they classified the different colors as different > models so it lost the top spot... > > I will state it again: market share is near-meaningless statistic > except to Marketing execs who need something to benchmark their > bonuses... and bored reporters who need to continually attack Apple. > > Apple is selling BILLIONS of dollars worth of computers every year, > the number of computers sold is increasing, and more importantly the > number of hardware and software developers is growing by leaps and > bounds. The rest is all hype. Now, you DID say the above, right? Mind giving us the credible source for this? I also fail to see the numbers there. So, if it's NOT 2.3% (down from 5%) - then what is it? Let's stop deluding ourselves! Apple needs to do "something(s)" and soon to become a compatible and mainstream computer platform. All the talk about "Alfa Romeos and Porches" is merely flawed analogies! Apple needs this change to survive and be a relevant computer NOT just in the eyes of its dedicated followers but for the general computer using population. Best, Henry