Chris Olson tapped out this message on 1/25/2003 10:23 PM >The trouble with most of these guys is that they are Pentium nuts. I >think the Pentium 4 might be better for some duties, but overall I >still think the PowerPC design has some merits that makes it a better >choice than the Pentium. If you try to explain to these megahertz >crazy x86 guys the relative merits of a 64-bit RISC processor that only >dissipates 19 watts at a clock speed of 1.2 gigahertz, it goes right in >one ear and out the other, usually. Most of them don't know the >difference between 32-bit and 64-bit, or RISC or CISC; they just want >to go buy a $999 Dell and throw OS X in it. TRUE! But, the site is for real in that they truly think there is some chance that they can convince Apple to allow X on INTEL and they truly desire it. I have argued basically the same thing -- why do you want what you think is such a nice OS on such crummy hardware? Why not just use it on the hardware it comes with. :-) Whether it can be done at all, I don't know, and what would happen to Apple if they did it, I think would be a disaster.