On Wednesday, July 9, 2003, at 08:22 am, Tarik Bilgin wrote: > In my non-scientific tests, using lame encoded mp3's versus AAC at an > identical bitrate I found that AAC sounded much closer to the original > (.aiff) in around 10 test cases. > > I always test at equal bitrates. I found that the file sizes where > about the same (AAC slightly smaller) but AAC sounded much fuller, > with greater clarity and greater depth to the music. > I should also add that I was using an M-Audio Sonic Theater USB sound card for my Ti as the dynamic range of the line out from the side of my G4 400 Ti is shocking. I suppose your mileage may vary. The big downside of AAC is the lack of compatibility with mp3 players, but I recently bought an iPod so I bit the bullet and am now encoding 192 bit AAC. -- Tarik Bilgin Opalblue tarik at opalblue.com