On Monday, March 17, 2003, at 10:56 PM, Mark Dorset wrote: > > Interesting - I am currently using an 800mhz tibook and have just > ordered the 1ghz model. Can you tell me if you've noticed much > difference between the two? (graphics or cpu speed, etc?) Absolutely none. I can't tell any difference running VirtualPC 6.0 with Windows 2000 Pro, Architosh, or Matlab 6.5 R13. It's possible, working in Photoshop, there might be some slight difference but it's not noticeable to me in real world usage. You'd have to measure the difference in thousanths of a second in time required to complete a task. I also have a dual 1GHz PowerMac that I use for CAD work, 3D modeling, and running finite element analysis. A fairly complicated finite element problem that will take the PowerMac 5-10 minutes to grind out the results, will totally choke the 1GHz Ti. SMP (Symmetrical Multiple Processing), and the additional RAM that multiple processors can address, gives a quantum performance leap compared to processor clock speed increase. To increase clock speed on a particular processor design you normally have to bump core voltage on the cpu. That ultimately generates more power dissipation. I prefer more processors running at slower speed and temperature to a single cpu clocking ultra-high frequency and becoming unstable when it reaches beyond 75% of the range of it's safe operating temperature. -- Chris