At 19:29 +1000 28-5-2003, Les Posen wrote: >Interesting Cnet article today about Lufthansa amongst others >trialling broadband in their long-haul aircraft. > >They are contemplating ethernet and wi-fi connections on board, >charging something like USD35 for an 8-hour flight. Discussion >posited the possibility of also paying for it via airmiles (FF >points) and receiving certain feeds, like news headlines, free. > >The beancounters estimated that each longhaul plane, if it averaged >250 pax per flight of which may be 50-80 would use it, would earn >the airline $2mill per year. > >Full story is here: http://news.com.com/2100-1034_3-1010231.html?tag=lh Les - very interesting article. Innovative idea ! I do not like the pricing model ($35/trip). My feeling is that at this price, people will only use it if they HAVE to. I doubt if there are ever 50 or 80 on a plane with a decent laptop with wifi, let alone 50 to 80 who owuld need a broadband connection at that price. If it was on an hourly basis, pro rata (eg $5/h) then many more will do it, even if only for the novelty. Assuming I actually use my broadband at home for 60h/month for the $60 flat fee, that seems an hourly 'rate' of about $1. So $5/h in a plane is perhaps not unreasonable. I guess it would also make a difference if we knew the cost to the airline of supplying the service. Are they seeking to develop a competitive advantgae by offering a service at cost, or are they simply generating extra high-margin revenue ($2m/plane)? The supplier said the fee for installation was modest. $35/flight sounds ultra-high-premium to me, not at all modest. $2m/plane revenue is a pipe dream, not a realistic business expectation, as I see it. The wifi network at Zurich airport propose CHF 35 (~$20) for 24 h of access. That is just too much, IMHO, for someone who is transit/in the Business lounge for less than 20 minutes usually. That seems like $60/h to me. No thanks. This is very parallel to the discussion of the iMusic Store business model. If they had selected "you can only download all of an artists music works, for just $100" as their model, there would have been some takers. But per track at ¢99 is working on a viable scale. I saw one article that suggested the record labels were getting ¢75 of those ¢99, so we can get the idea of who is the source of any rip-off element in that pricing! regards, Trevor