On Wednesday, October 1, 2003, at 01:49 AM, PowerBook G4 Titanium List wrote: > Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 14:36:13 -0400 > Subject: Re: [Ti] 10.2.8 > From: John Griffin <jwegriffin at mac.com> > Message-ID: <BB9F455D.8DF5%jwegriffin at mac.com> > > Henry Kalir typed this message on 9/30/03 2:32 PM: > >> I think Apple should make amends to the folks who had installed it >> and got >> burnt - like sending them a CD with an operational OS. >> >> It's a sad day for all of us when something like that happens. > > I have to admit I am rather puzzled by this as well. Obviously Apple > did not > do its homework on this one. > > jg Indeed but is not that true that Apple has a compatibility Lab with most models and configurations available? I would expect that Apple does extensive tests on those machines before releasing. Hence my question: how problems like the ones complained about - especially in Apple Discussions - do get unnoticed? I tend to believe they did not appear on Apple test machine so what is making an OS update a failure for a sufficiently large spectrum of machines for Apple to pull it out? (homework not entirely done?!) Massimo