on 4/21/04 5:53 PM, Justin R. Miller at incanus at codesorcery.net wrote: > On Apr 21, 2004, at 3:04 PM, Dave Cedrone wrote: > >> Why did they switch to Aluminum? Was it because of the reported >> Airport problems with titanium or something additional? > > As I understand it, the Airport problems were related mostly to the > antennae being in the base as opposed to the top of the display as they > are now. In addition, I was talking to a Powerbook engineer who said that they didn't realize that LiIon batteries were a 2.4GHz sink (ie. They *eat* 2.4GHz radiation). > As far as titanium is concerned, my guess is that aluminum, while still > striking and durable, is cheaper than titanium. Note that the weight > has gone up, though. I'm guessing that titanium originally was almost > a novelty factor and now that metal laptops are kind of accepted, > something more practical was chosen as a material. Also, only the top and bottom cases were titanium, the majority of the case was composite, including the frame. -- Glenn L. Austin <>< Computer Wizard and Race Car Driver <glenn at austin-home.com> <http://www.austin-home.com/glenn/>