Quoting kalirhe at UMDNJ.EDU: > Quoting "Dr. Trevor J. Hutley" <hutley at geneva-link.ch>: > > > At 13:23 -1000 22/4/04, aron wrote: > > >At 10:49 AM 4/22/2004, you wrote: > > >>http://www.toshiba.co.jp/about/press/2004_04/pr2201.htm > > >> > > >>I don't know about you guys, but I'll be picking one of these up the > > second > > >>they're available under $500 > > > > > >Oh no, it's 4200RPM though. > > > > Aron - exactly my thought ! Since I have a 5400 rpm 80 Gb drive in > > my Al-book, it would offer me no advantage (since a 25% size increase > > running 23% slower does not seem real progress to me). > > Unless your concern is mainly with information storage capacity issues > (vs > retrieval) - in which case you'll be doing 20% better with the 100 GB > drive. Oops...sorry - should be "25% better". Best, Henry