At 10:13 AM -0400 4/23/04, kalirhe at umdnj.edu wrote: > > my Al-book, it would offer me no advantage (since a 25% size increase >> running 23% slower does not seem real progress to me). > >Unless your concern is mainly with information storage capacity issues (vs >retrieval) - in which case you'll be doing 20% better with the 100 GB >drive. To tell you the truth, I'm down to 10 GB free. An extra 20 GB would be a 300% increase for me. -- Regards, Steve (is tv wake zone?)