On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Glenn L. Austin wrote: . . . > Personally, I don't like it, but then again I don't work on the Finder team > so I don't know what all they put in there (beyond the view info). . . . So if the .DS_Store file is just keeping state info about the directory, then the question is just "What all state do you want kept, where do you want to keep it, and how much user access do you want to allow?". Is it binary (strings shows some nonsense strings) as an attempt at security? It seems to me that the open source movement, where you make innards available to users who want, and include interested people who can help, is an expression of the humanistic attitude. People who can play well with others. Isn't Apple, with OSX, working toward opensourceness a positive sign? When I 1st was told about the thoughtful design that went into early Apple & Macintosh stuff, especially the interface and particularly the Human Interface Guidelines, it sounded like people who were serious about playing well, and the Guidelines were the basic playground politeness rules so things worked well for everyone. That's the sociological understanding of what on a much wider scale common morality is, for example. But then, don't people put some blame for Apple having gone into siege mentality on M$oft not playing well on the wider scale of common morality?