On 31.3.2004 20:31, "Robert Ameeti" <robert at ameeti.net> wrote: >> On 31.3.2004 16:44, "Jason Tertadian" <haiku23 at mac.com> wrote: >> >>> Actually, I remember reading somewhere once that a vertical mount is >>> actually better in some way. >> >> Airport base stations use different antennas. The original graphite base >> station used the Lucent Card that has the antenna built into the card. The >> next design, the snow base station, and then the one now, the extreme base >> station, use a dipole antenna that is built into the case. >> Horizontal mounting is known to better due to the fact that the antenna >> pattern for all the designs is more like a flat round pattern. > > If the signal is not spherical, then the 'best' orientation would be different > based on where the signal needs to go. Actually on the original graphite base station one could refer to the signal as a small spherical pattern but still like a pancake. Where the snow and extreme antennas, dipole types, are truly flatter. Ck this link for info and how different antenna patterns look... especially the dipole. http://www.rfcafe.com/references/electrical/antenna_patterns.htm