At 00:05 -0600 23/11/04, Chris Olson wrote: >Safari is a fairly new browser undergoing constant development. >I've found it to be not only the best, but also the best integrated >browser for Mac OS X. It works fine on ~99% of the sites I use or >visit, >What's really sad is that Safari is a standards-compliant browser, >while we have many website developers who develop to Microsoft >standards. And Microsoft standards are somewhat different. How >does Bill Gates change a light bulb? He doesn't He declares >darkness the new standard. I use Safari (1.2.4) with 10.3.6, and I also find that for 99% plus sites it works fine. I find it very annoying that BANKS seem to be the least standards compliant. The internet banking of the Saudi-British Bank (SABB.com) is very simple and effective to use, BUT it will only work via IE on a PC. This is one of my few "needs" for Virtual PC. Is there a professional way we can approach these deviant (non-standard-compliant) sites ? Somewhere to refer them to, as to how to correctly write and set-up a site to be standards compliant? Rather than just sending a rude letter? So that we can contribute to a better web future. If so, I can probabll;y select 5 sites that fit that category, and will send off the appropriate information, with a demand for compliance by a certain time, otherwise else I will send a letter to the press or something similar, to get them in to action.... regards, Trevor