On Nov 30, 2005, at 2:52 PM, Ian Collier wrote: > And this is relevant precisely how to a report indicating that > Intel's new processor performs pretty well. Specifically the report > states "Pentium M processor looks set to provide a significant > boost to notebook performance" and more in a similar vein. > > I don't quite get your point. I'm sorry. You would have to be familiar with Intel's history to understand the joke. AMD had a 233mmx processor, Intel had a 200mmx processor. Intel's push to get the PII released on it's proprietary slot prevented them from finding a floating point bug in the processor. AMD had the Athlon, 50mhz faster than the PIII, at a better price. Intel needed a fast, low priced version of the i820 chipset that used SDRAM instead of RDRAM. They push it out the door. The Memory Translator Hub had a flaw and 3,000,000 motherboards were recalled. AMD was pushing 1.2 GHZ, Intel over clocked the 1 Ghz PIII to 1.13 Ghz but had to recall them a month later. This was a beautiful example of a paper publicity launch to match AMD, because the recall affected less than 200 customers. With the failure of the 1.13 Ghz PIII, The Pentium 4 was pushed to early release. The processor was available for 6 weeks before any motherboards were released. The delay was due to a flaw in the chipset. Intel, hoping to steal AMD's Opteron thunder, days before the Opteron release, produce a great new workstation chipset. Canterwood (875) - a high end workstation chipset along with the 3.0 Ghz 800mhz FSB Pentium 4, and it arrived in typical Intel style - flawed. So Intel halts shipments and recalls them. AMD is selling 64-bit low power mobile processors and outperforming Intel in sales of chips for personal computers. The Pentium M "Yonah" is pushed to early release............ Keep that class action link bookmarked. You might want to refer to it in a couple years. -- Chris ------------------------- PGP Key: http://astcomm.net/~chris/PGP_Public_Key/ -------------------------