On Dec 6, 2005, at 9:28 AM, Ross Winn wrote: > I would also say that anyone who thinks that OS X is going to have > more overhead than Windows XP on a comparable processor is probably > smoking crack. I'm not sure about that. Windows XP will install and run with some loss of features on an AMD K62-233 with 64 MB RAM, and requires 1.5 GB hard disk space. OS X Tiger will run on a G3/267 but requires minimum 256 MB RAM, and requires 3.0 GB of hard disk space. Minimum System Requirements for both operating environments: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/pro/upgrading/sysreqs.mspx http://www.apple.com/macosx/upgrade/requirements.html The memory footprint and cpu load to run Apple's Aqua interface is considerably higher than Windows XP Luna. -- Chris ------------------------- PGP Key: http://astcomm.net/~chris/PGP_Public_Key/ -------------------------