> Alan - but could there truly be any serious contention that the > comparison of the size of [the] iPod Shuffle with a pack of chewing > gum could be misunderstood as a suggestionn to eat [the] iPod ! > No, I don't think so, but Apple would not let such frivolous copy be a part of the webpage - at least not for long if it was a prank by some lowly webmaster. Of course I don't think that there could be a case made that the comparison of a plastic-encased consumer electronics device to a pack of gum would imply that it's edible (iPod), but again, there is that warning right there on the web page. > If your ability to understand and raw simple conclusions from clear > advertising was that poor, you would already be in serious trouble > with the rest of your life. Yep. > > I think that such a footnote could even exist - unless it is a spoof > by the writers of the copy - speaks volumes about the nature of a > society that needs to be fed in such a way. Yep. Danger! Coffee is hot! Remember that fiasco with McDonald's? --alan