> Somebody pointed that out to me last night. I laughed out loud. > > It's interesting that Apple refer to the iPod not as an iPod, or the iPod, but > always just iPod. This is an example of that. You might write, Do not eat > the iPod shuffle. Instead of saying in their manual, to reset the iPod, they > say to reset iPod.... etc.. > > Well, it is next to pack of chewing gum, so I guess in our silly little > litigious society, if they didn't have that disclaimer, perhaps someone might > win a large settlement or lawsuit after their kid tries to eat the iP... er, > eat iPod. > > --alan > > Dr. Trevor J. Hutley wrote: >> [OT] iPod Shuffle >> >> >> >> Has anybody seen footnote 2 on the iPod Shuffle page >> >> >> >> >> http://www.apple.com/ipodshuffle/ >> >> >> >> >> where it says: >> >> >> >> >> >> 2. Do not eat iPod shuffle. >> >> >> >> >> I can hardly belive I am reading that !! >> >> >> >> >> Could it be a joke by Apple Legal Dept or is it proof that the USA legal >> system has crossed in to the ridiculous? >> >> >> >> >> Any insight in to what this could be? >> >> >> >> >> T. ----- I vote for B proof that the USA legal system has crossed into the ridiculous. John ;) -- People say that hard work never killed anybody, but did you ever know anybody who rested to death? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/pipermail/titanium/attachments/20050113/8874bbb0/attachment.html