[Ti] Question for the great and powerfull, er, uh Woz...

[Henry Kalir]

Steve Wozniak wrote:

> At 10:05 PM -0400 2005.06.06, MBurke6225 at aol.com wrote:
>
>>
>> Woz was at the keynote today so he might night be checking on the 
>> list.  But I for one would love to get his take on current 
>> developments.  You've seen the threads from the list, any thoughts, 
>> Steve?
>
>
> I am optimistic, although I didn't expect to be.
>
> I, as other PowerBook users, must appreciate lower power consumption 
> per unit of computation and I don't distrust Apple's engineers to be 
> cognizant of that in the future, for both IBM and Intel processors.
>
> A lot of wording today was in terms of Intel and not X-86. Apple is 
> surely expecting something special and unknown (today) by the time 
> this ships. That's my opinion. The future probably holds processor 
> advantages for Intel.
>
> Regardless, a lot of us don't care that much about the engine used 
> under the hood.
>
> I'm confident that the compatibility path will be well accomplished. I 
> notice the specialness of my computer in terms of input/output, not 
> the processor inside. Our Macintoshes should remain 'special' but also 
> high performance and even more bang for the buck, which doesn't take 
> away from what makes them so special.
>
> If the processor is important to some extent, then it's better to have 
> a willing partner.
>
>-- 
>  
>
>
> Best regards,
> Steve  (ok a new size tv)
> ````````````````````````````````````````````````````
> Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Thanks, Steve.

You're not only a good man, but also a wise one.

Best,

Henry

Not a hardware or software engineer, nor do I play one on TV...just an 
honest-to-goodness loyal Apple user since 1980.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/pipermail/titanium/attachments/20050607/bd48930a/attachment.html