On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 07:30:40AM -0400, Henry Kalir wrote: > > I hope that now all those developers for the PC would write for the Mac, > that its market share (a concept which you seem to equate with > mediocrity, for some reason) would rise to the double digits and stand > on it's own 2 legs! This thread has educating, interesting, and painful, all at the same time. :-) Chris makes some great points about 64-bit computing, and the investment that developers have put into it (and which now seems to be going back to 32-bit, at least for now). Shawn makes some great points about the processor being independent of the OS/user experience, and therefore the change not being any big deal. My take is that it's something in between, depending on which side you're approaching from - but, I lean slightly more to Chris' point of view. Oh wait, was I trying to make a point!?!? :-) In reference to the quoted material, I've seen this comment made several times now (Macs will use Intel processors, so we can lure Windows developers to the platform, and ultimately increase market share). Well, hate to break it to those who think this, but unless MacOS sprouts Windows APIs, programming for the Mac isn't going to be any more or less challenging for Windows developers - their experience will be largely identical to programming for a PowerPC-based Mac. i.e., the fact that there's an Intel processor in the Mac changes nothing from a Windows developers' PoV. -- Paul H. Yoshimune paul at yoshimune.com http://www.yoshimune.com/