On 6/9/05 2:15 AM, "Chris Olson" <chris.olson at astcomm.net> wrote: > I got more class than that. LMAO Dude...it's "I've" got more class than that." Happy to help. > My whole point has been, and I believe I've presented it without any > personal attacks, that this "transition" is not going to work for > everybody. No one said it would. I don't recall anyone on *any* list I'm on claim it's going to be all sunshine and roses. But it's also not doom and gloom *community wide*. Will some customers be upset? Sure? Will Apple lose some customers? Sure. Do I believe Apple is doing this because Apple believes this is in *Apple's* best interests? Damn right. > If they were really interested in building the > best computers for their customers they wouldn't be throwing all their > eggs in the Intel basket Why not? They had all their eggs in the IBM basket? > I don't care if a PowerMac G6 > costs $7,000. You can't be serious. Apple is a long way away from the days when they could charge huge premiums on their machines. Apple is much more in tune with market realities - *that's* what drives the company more often than not - not, "Let's build the biggest, baddest machine we can and sell it for 100% more than any comparable PC! They'll buy it! They're *Mac users* and they love us!" Not gonna happen. > They're not doing it, so > they're going to loose some customers. Certainly - but they will also gain customers. > I was told offlist to not let the cpu hit me in the ass on the way out. > That certainly sounds like a formula for success for Apple Computer, > wouldn't you say? If you think Apple is on the way out, sure. But not many of us do. -- Shawn King Host/Executive Producer Your Mac Life http://www.yourmaclife.com