On Jun 9, 2005, at 1:38 PM, Chris Olson wrote: > On Jun 9, 2005, at 11:36 AM, Peter Krug wrote: > > > >> I ask you this: What would WWDC been like if Steve came out and >> said that G5 development had stalled, and while Macs are still >> twice as fast as PC's, we don't have a plan to solve the problem. >> >> > > How is there no plan? The G5 and Mac OS X is designed around > parallel computing. If you need more power - throw more processors > at the task instead of cranking the voltage on the bus. Xgrid, > Xsan with Fibre Channel interconnects do exactly that. But it > could be done in one box too. What's wrong with a quad-cpu > PowerMac for high-end tasks? Or a dual cpu machine with dual core > cpu's? Or a dual core cpu in a PowerBook for that matter? The > technology is there. At least with PowerPC it is. Intel is still > trying to catch up to AMD on x86. > -- > Chris > Jobs said what the problem was in his keynote. It's heat. I'd love a dual core g5 powerbook too. But I'd also like it not to burn my clothes, or be 2 inches thick. -Neil