At 01:13 PM -0500 03/25/05, John Griffin wrote: >Dr. Trevor J. Hutley typed this message on 3/25/05 10:54 AM: > >> Actually, I would like to get a very specific answer to that very question. >> >> I have exactly the same feeling as you. But I have no detailed >> technical knowledge of what the standards are that are not being > > complied with. > >However it may, as you say, deeper then that and may indeed involve the >inability or intentional blocking of "unrecognized" browsers such as Safari >in the Windows world. Well much of the problem seems to start with the fact that IE is much more accepting of badly codeds sites, not to mention maliciously coded. Then, IE doens't follow all the WC3 (someithing like that) standards. So, standards compliant browsers, Mozilla (i.e. Camino, Firefox), KHTML(i.e. Safari) tend to choke on the IE sites that are rather sloppy with their coding. Then there is the usual Microsoft attempt to make their software exclusive, or at least so stuff only works for them, and that would account for the rest. But, then again "why attribute to malevolence what can be explained by incompetence." eirk g