Excuse me? IBM not able to pump out low-heat, energy efficient processors? Um, well, IBM already has these processors. And apparently there are even quad processors about to be released. And they are 64-bit. And Intel? Why they are talking about dual processors that are 32 bit thay they “may” release sometime next year. Sorry it just doesn’t wash! jg On 14-Nov-05, at 6:23 PM, Matt Kibildis wrote: > I don't understand this "shooting the corporate foot" business. Why > would Apple not want to switch from IBM to Intel? IBM couldn't pump > out low-heat, energy efficient processors.