On Apr 6, 2006, at 8:38 PM, Scott Smith wrote: > It's a spirited debate with very good opinions and prophetic > statements on both sides of the issue. Let's play nice. God knows > what Steve J. is doing with the Boot Camp facto Exactly. It's only conjecture, but it looks like Apple is concerned about the marketability of Intel Macs in the face of identical, but cheaper, hardware from other x86 vendors. I mean face it, there's no software for Intel Macs from the major players. Adobe says maybe Q2 2007. Microsoft (Office) only promises - no specific dates mentioned. There are no 64-bit apps at all because there's no 64-bit Intel Macs. The Mac mini's base price went up $100 with Intel Inside, and for what? To get a computer with shared VRAM, no hardware MPEG-2 decoder, and no software other than what it ships with? That's a pretty hard sell. But hey if you can run Windows on it, now there's something that will capture the attention of the press and detract from the real issues! Makes no difference if it's a totally useless feature to Mac users because who wants to reboot every time you need to run a Windows app. It's marketing. The easy switch to Intel where you just fill a checkbox in Xcode and voila! you have a Universal binary didn't go quite as smooth as His Steveness said it was going to. -- Chris ------------------------- PGP Key: http://astcomm.net/~chris/PGP_Public_Key/ -------------------------