On Apr 6, 2006, at 3:44 PM, Chris Olson wrote: > And here's were I rest my case; Mach/XNU is a RISC kernel - never > designed to perform on CISC hardware. It's strange that you say that, since Mach was designed to run on CISC hardware, and MachO is far more efficient on CISC than it is on RISC. -- Glenn L. Austin <>< Computer Wizard and Race Car Driver <glenn at austin-home.com> <http://www.austin-home.com/glenn/>