[Ti] Intel Mac Mini?

[Kynan Shook]

That's funny; it seems to me that YOUR proof-of-concept, if it is  
what you claim it to be, is much more dangerous.  It would not be  
difficult for somebody to capture your demo, post it on some online  
forum as something benign, or as a "safe" demo.  Or, for that matter,  
to rewrite portions of it to allow it to spread more easily on its  
own.  You're giving the hackers and script kiddies more to work with  
than Secunia or anybody else.

For that matter, the *smart* companies and individuals I've seen  
lately only distribute the proofs-of-concept or dangerous exploits to  
those who legitimately need them - Apple or antivirus companies.  I  
suggest you follow their lead.

Frankly, Chris, after doing some quick research on you, I'm not  
inclined to believe that your life is an example of exemplary  
ethics.  Distributing malware, even with the permission of the  
receiving party, is not something that an ethical person would do as  
casually as you do.

Chris Olson <chris.olson at astcomm.net> writes:
> The proof-of-concept demos from Secunia
> et al are purely negligent in that any hacker can pick up on them,
> see how it's done, and implement it in the wild.  And they do this
> openly, knowing that Apple doesn't have a patch to fix it.  They're
> the ones whom I'd question motives and ethics......