On Jan 18, 2006, at 12:18 PM, Bill Reburn wrote: > Oh, I see. In my opinion, I go by the rule of thumb to buy the > fastest machine I can afford. I work in Graphic Design/Vis > communications and the bottom line is the performance of my gear. Same here, though I'm also in ME at college and do web site design on the side, plus a load of other stuff. > As far as life-span, I don't think there is any evidence around > that shows faster machines burn out more quickly than slower ones > (is there??). Unless it is a machine that is over-clocked which > adds stress to the CPU, which isn't the case here.. it's a > different "engine" altogether. I meant useable lifespan, not hardware life - sorry for the confusion. Also, I'm talking about product families. So... is the $1,999 MacBook Pro a better deal than the $2,499 MacBook Pro? etc...