> From: Dennis Fazio <dfz at mac.com> > Subject: Re: [Ti] Prediction has come true [OT] > On May 21, 2007, at Mon, May 21 2007, 12:42 pm, John Griffin wrote: > >> Well folks, the Intel - IBM debate has just been updated. As many >> here predicted years ago, IBM has just released a RISC chip that is >> capable of running rings around anything that Intel could even >> dream of designing - let alone manufacture. > > You are implying that Apple made its Intel switch decision based on > raw performance of the processors. That was not the case. > > Since everyone has access to the same technology and the same state > of the art knowledge of circuit design and processor architecture, > you can be sure that there will never be a significant raw > performance advantage of one microprocessor over another. > > This is a great server chip, but can IBM or would IBM also produce > workstation versions and low-power laptop versions with sufficient > yields and in sufficient quantities and at a competitive price to be > used in a full Mac product line? > > Can all of the mainstream software be compiled and optimized with > trivial effort to perform as well as or better than on any other > popular processor architecture. > > I believe the answer to both of those questions would be no. That is > why Apple switched. > > IBM's focus is on embedded processors and high-powered servers, not > workstations and laptops. Thank you Dennis. Well put. I agree completely.