<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Bill White wrote:<br>
<blockquote cite="midBECB1CC7.25751%25billwhite@mac.com" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 6/7/05 9:29 AM, Chris Olson <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:chris.olson@astcomm.net"><chris.olson@astcomm.net></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">This marriage with Intel is the most inconceivable thing I've ever seen.
Anybody who knows anything at all knows that if you want performance on x86
you go to AMD. Is Steve Jobs a personal friend with Paul Otellini or
something? I can't see any other reason for it.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Here's an interesting perspective on why the move to Intel might make sense:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://blog.wired.com/cultofmac/">http://blog.wired.com/cultofmac/</a>
-- Bill
</pre>
</blockquote>
Wait! Why align oneself with just one company?<br>
Does windows nto run on BOTH AMD and Intel CPUS???<br>
<br>
If so - why can the Mac OS?<br>
<br>
Why do we always have to limit ourselves to just ONE CPU and be at the
mercy of that manufacturer to produce enough and to develop new
products??<br>
<br>
Let the REAL Mac era begin!<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
<br>
Henry<br>
</body>
</html>