On 6/7/03 1:37 PM, "Jim Soriano" <jsoriano at sumbeach.com> wrote: > Steven Rogers said... > >> Anyone using virtual PC 5 in 10.2.6? I'm using VPC 5.04 and haven't >> booted it for a while. <snippage occurs here> >> I've pretty much decided I'm not going to upgrade anymore. >> Looks too much like they're trying to turn it into a cash cow. So if it >> won't boot, I'm probably going to erase it. Everything was backed up >> outside VPC. > > Hi Steven: > > I use VPC 6.0 daily on my machine (TiPBG4-800, 1GB DRAM, OS 10.2.6, W2K > with 512KB RAM allocation) and it works flawlessly. I agree that > previous releases of VPC had some real ugly performance issues -- I > tried them all with both W98SE and W2K, and none of them really worked > adequately under OS X. But, I think Connectix got it right with VPC > 6.0. > > I use Microsoft Project 2K and IE (for those nasty sites with > x86-specific Java) every day, with occasional use of Outlook and other > Windows-specific apps. With a totally clean install of both VPC and > W2K I've (knock on wood) had zero blue screens. > > FWIW and YMMV. I am using VPC-6 with windows 2k Prof. It refuses to boot, locks up when it flashes the dot by the printer. When I have to reboot I have to startup in 9.2 boot vpc then save and quit. This started some where around 10.2.4