On Tuesday, Mar 18, 2003, at 10:22 US/Central, hart at nasw.org wrote: > I'm several months down the road with Mail now, and, while in general > the Junk filter does a good job, I'm seeing more false positives > (legit mail filtered as junk). Any tips on most effectively using the > filter? Should it be the last filter? That seems logical, in a way. > Does the filter learn much when you click Not Junk? Hi Stephen, I've had extremely good "luck" with Mail's junk filtering. While it does occasionally tag a few legit e-mails as Junk, I don't really get too upset, as the e-mails generally fit the profile for spam. They are usually auto-generated registration type e-mails that one gets after registering a product/software. I used to get false positives on staff e-mails from time to time, but then added a bit to my Junk filter which seemed to help with that. Here is how I have mine set up. I've put options in <> - Junk rule is the LAST rule applied; Custom setup Description: Junk if <all> conditions met: <Sender is not in my Address Book> <Message is Junk Mail> Then I transfer to a specific mailbox, so that I can check them out to make sure there isn't legit e-mail getting through. (I also keep spam to help test and train other spam filtering software.) I think Mail does an excellent job, considering just how difficult it is to write software to be "smart" enough to catch spam. IMO, 100% accuracy for filtering spam is unattainable. People who think otherwise should try writing their own software to see the challenge involved. But again, that's MnsHO*. I'm happy with the ~95% accuracy that Mail is providing me. gretchen *My not so Humble Opinion