A further note of clarification, specifically regarding ethernet Gigabit transfer. Hardware involved: 2 modern (933 Mhz) machines, crossover cable (no switch), OS 9.2, Apple built-in Gigabit ethernet. Time to transfer 1.86 GB file, 11 minutes (= 22 Megabits/sec). Any ideas?? The website mentioned lists transfer rates of 3x this for 100 Mb ethernet and other Mac platforms. Thanks again. - Vard ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Things that make a difference: > 1. Cable quality. > 2. Switch quality/setup. > 3. Client hardware speeds (CPU/Disk/NIC/RAM). > 4. Server hardware speeds (CPU/Disk/NIC/RAM). > 5. Client OS software. > 6. Server OS software. > 7. Transfer protocol. > > A long time ago I gathered a bunch of results and put together a table > with some relative comparisons, benchmarking different AppleshareIP > server solutions: > http://www.opus1.com/ron/asipstats.html > > It's quite a bit outdated for what's currently on the market > hardware/software wise, but it does a good job, in at least this case, > of showing the *extremely* wide range of performance in the various > products that were on the market at a given point in time. For a 100Mb > link, it was possible to see everything from 2 to 65 mb/sec. with some > pretty ancient hardware... (If anyone wants to add numbers for newer > hardware, send it on in! I hear that current speeds are hitting up to > 80mb/sec with current OS X boxen.) > > Typical bottlenecks usually include slow server OS's (*cough*Microsoft > SFM*cough*), cheap "switches" that were designed for "workgroups" (not > core infrastructure), cheapie NIC's, slowish IDE drives, and > misconfigured switches.