On Saturday, August 23, 2003, at 05:17 PM, Randy B. Singer wrote: > Steven Rogers said: > >> Second - a widespread Mac virus would certainly attract big press. > > I don't disagree with your overall argument, but the above statement > has already proven to be false. > > Two years ago the Simpsons virus . . . was stopped quickly and it > was not widespread) nor did it garner "huge headlines." In fact, few > Mac users even know about the existence of this virus. Well, I said a widespread virus would attract headlines. You said that is false because a virus that was *not* widespread didn't garner headlines. I don't quite see the logic. SR