On Sunday, Aug 24, 2003, at 14:36 Canada/Eastern, Steven Rogers wrote: > You've just presented a more long winded version of the same essential > logical pattern OK. Let me be as concise as I can. Fact 1: Win malware >> Mac malware Fact 2: Win users >> Mac users Question: Why Fact 1? Answer 1: Because of Fact 2. Answer 2: Because of Macs are more secure, which I can prove by looking "at the consistency of design and the kinds of tasks a typical administrator must perform to make and keep the system secure", i.e., a theoretical systems analysis. Others may disagree, and I cannot provide an empirical test, but I'm right nevertheless. Occam's Razor: "Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem". Answer 1 is the more parsimonious (let alone being based on indisputable evidence), therefore it is to be preferred. > You've got a snarky streak a mile wide, and a good example of it is > making that comment rather than simply writing something civil and > focused on communication rather than sarcasm. I see that my previous message was predicated on a mistaken assumption. My deepest apologies. f