On Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 04:55 PM, Florin Alexander Neumann wrote: > > On Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 16:52 Canada/Eastern, Steven Rogers wrote: > >> I don't see how one could advocate creating disk partitions on the >> basis that its easier for a newbie than picking files from a list. > > What do you use for regular backups? Retrospect >> But the key is that usually there is some scheme where files of a >> certain type or use go in one partition, and the whole question is >> how big it has to be, and what happens if you guess too small or too >> > large. > > Indeed. But this is not rocket science. If you're an average user, > what you have are various word processing files, some spreadsheets, > web stuff, and so on. Few of these are likely to be above 5MB. The > music and image files -- the really big ones -- those go chiefly on a > separate partition, and you're not going to back them up on a regular > basis. So a 20GB partition should be adequate for the average user -- > provided there is additional storage on a separate partition. Perhaps its not rocket science if you consider that the average person is never going to fill up an 80 GB drive - in a sense, the size of the partitions doesn't matter - like, how many Word and Appleworks files does it take to use up several GB of space? > If you're a graphic designer or into music production or digital > video, or you need to host a massive database on your machine -- > you're not an average user and you need a different setup. Sure, but why does the average user need it? SR