On Wednesday, May 21, 2003, at 13:44 Canada/Eastern, Randy B. Singer wrote: > Florin Alexander Neumann said: > >> What do you use for regular backups? The pickings are fairly slim on >> the Mac, so I recommend Retrospect, which has a decent track record >> (if >> worse than miserable tech support). > > Just a point of fact. The pickings for backup software on OS X are not > even close to "slim." See: Well, let's see: > With a .Mac subscription you get a copy of Backup: > http://www.mac.com/ Requires .mac subscription for full functionality. Disqualified. > Retrospect The only serious solution for a Mac user. Rather imperfect -- it has unexpected bugs and dismal tech support (don't let me get started!), but, as the French say, faute de mieux, on couche... > Intego's Personal Back-Up A possible alternative to Retrospect. I tested it, didn't like it, but it may get better. A good thing too -- nothing works like a little competition to spice things up. > Carbon Copy Cloner Good tool, but not really a backup tool. > iMsafe $15 Doesn't do optical, let alone tape. > Revival [Your link is broken, and so appear to be links in other places, like MacUpdate. Does anyone know what happened to this one?] > Synchronize! Pro X Again, doesn't do optical. Otherwise, it could be a possible alternative to Retrospect -- although, at twice the price, not much of a competitor. > Synk X [Your links are broken.] Another sync'ing tool, not really backup. No longer under development, so who knows if it will work with the next release of the OS? > Tri-BACKUP Didn't know about this one. Sounds like worth trying -- although it's not clear from the promo if it does optical. Has anyone tested it? > BackupToolkit This also is worth looking at, and FWB has an excellent reputation. Has anyone tested it? > LaCie SilverKeeper Lightweight. I suspect LaCie is making it available for free until they build enough muscle into it. Right now, not in the running. > Psync, SwitchBack, Folders Synchronizer X, Chronosync All synchronizers, not really backup tools. There are quite a few synchronizers out there (we can add ExecutiveSync, FileSynchronization, and so on), and they can be used for some backup purposes, but -- in my opinion -- do not replace true backup tools. Back when the world was young and 500MB was a huge disk, I used to back up with a small, now defunct, shareware synchronizer called MacUpdate (the best value for $5 I ever got). It worked like a charm. But omnia muntantur... Morever, in this respect I'd rather not rely on a shareware tool. Shareware authors -- and some of their stuff is better than some offerings of 'reputable' companies -- simply do not have the resources for the kind of testing Dantz or FWB do (or should do). So, what are we left with for serious consideration? Retrospect, Data Backup (I don't think you've mentioned this one -- it's from Prosoft Engineering <http://www.prosoftengineering.com/products/data_backup.php> and the one I like best after Retrospect), Backup Toolkit (from FWB), and perhaps Tri-Backup and Personal Backup. That seems to me pretty slim pickings, relative to the Windows market. (And, let's not forget, Microsloth doesn't require a subscription to MSN to activate the bundled backup utility.) Believe me, I was so annoyed last time I talked to the guys from Dantz that I'd like nothing better than to switch (and recommend others to switch) from Retrospect to something else. f