At 3:00p -0400 2003.05.21, Florin Alexander Neumann wrote: >Morever, in this respect I'd rather not rely on a shareware tool. >Shareware authors -- and some of their stuff is better than some >offerings of 'reputable' companies -- simply do not have the >resources for the kind of testing Dantz or FWB do (or should do). Interesting point - at what point is shareware no longer shareware but instead a 'reputable' company with the kind of resources to do extensive testing? I'd cite the authors of GraphicConverter and VueScan as interesting case studies in this regard. And PackIt begat StuffIt. I'm sure there are also examples of 'reputable' but short on adequacy of testing. [BTW: I see new versions of Symantec's Norton products are in the offing <g>] -- 'tis as said. [Reality is defined by being described]