At 5:08 PM -0500 4/3/04, Charles Martin wrote: >>>6. REGULAR, VERIFIED BACKUPS. Alluded to in point 2 above but really >>>can't be stressed enough. >>Although I believe in backups, I notice since moving to X that people >>really really seem to stress their importance, perhaps more so than when >>running OS9. Given that X is supposed to be more robust/stable etc, this >>extra emphasis always strikes me as a bit odd. Doesn't invalidate the >>advice though :-) > >There's probably lots of reasons for this, but here's mine: > ><snip> An OS X system cannot be recreated by simply dragging the >System Folder from an old disk/cd/zip as you could with OS 9. The flip side of this coin - with OS X, there is much greater separation between the OS space and the user space. Consequently, it's become a lot easier to recommend that a user wipe everything, reinstall the OS, and then restore the user space. This has always been a much more reliable method of fixing things but is easier to accomplish with OS X. [ Perhaps related - does anyone know of a Norton Ghost-like tool that supports HFS+? ] -- 'tis as said. [Reality is defined by being described]