On 4/20/04 12:36 AM, "Alex" <alist at sprint.ca> wrote: > >> Unless something has changed that I'm unaware of, having multiple >> versions of OS9 is a way bad... > > Under "Classic" Mac OS (v9.x or earlier), one should only have a single > System Folder on a given volume (but on a given machine one may have > several System Folders, as long as they are on separate volumes). This > limitation may be bypassed by using various utilities which "bless" a > particular System Folder. > > Under OS X, one may have more than one System Folder (not System > folder!) on the same volume, although only one may be active at any one > time. Before using Classic, one of them must be selected in the Classic > prefpane. > > In fact, under OS X it may even be a good idea two have two System > Folders, one with a minimum set of extensions and drivers to be used > for Classic, another with a full set of extensions to be used to boot > the machine (obviously, this doesn't apply to Macs which can only boot > in OS X). Agreed. If you plan to boot in OS 9 (as opposed to Classic) it's a good idea to have two System Folders. Kirk My new e-book: Take Control of Users and Accounts in Panther http://www.tidbits.com/takecontrol/panther/users.html . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . kirk at mcelhearn.com | http://www.mcelhearn.com . . . . . . . . Kirk McElhearn | Chemin de la Lauze | 05600 Guillestre | France . .