On Tuesday, Jan 27, 2004, at 18:55 Canada/Eastern, Vincent Cayenne wrote: > I concur that years ago HP's build quality and attention to the > availability of drivers was excellent. "Was" being most definitely the operative word. > I find however that current product, especially multifunction units, > ink jet printers and scanners suffer from cheap quality and a > lamentable tardiness in bringing adequate drivers to market. IMHO -- ditto. Case in point: HP's tardiness in producing Panther-compatible drivers for its all-in-one devices. > Epson gives excellent output at the expense of clogging on some models > in some environments. I also get the impression that Epson gives > excellent value in their scanners but are sometimes slow to add > support for older scanning and multifunction devices. Again, ditto. If you want quality in your inkjet hard copy, Epson is the safest bet. But it does come at a price, and if you only use your printer once in a blue moon, probably the price is too high. > Now, I'll say: > "Use Epson or Canon ink jet tech for best results, Canon or Epson > Durabrite-ink ink jets for best non-art-critical value, Brother > personal lasers, HP network lasers and avoid Lexmark, and avoid HP ink > jets." Manibus et pedibus. And I'd add, also stay away from Samsung. The price is attractive, but quality and Mac-side software is atrocious. An additional point. I shouldn't buy an all-in-one/multifunction to use with a Mac. The hardware may be OK, but, in almost every instance, the software has problems or is markedly inferior to the PC version. f