On Monday, Mar 29, 2004, at 12:55 Canada/Eastern, Charles Martin wrote: >> From: J <themacintoshlady at earthlink.net> >> OS X has been crashing a lot lately even though I run >> several routines. It just fills up and can't take it anymore I guess. >> > This comment is indicative of something more seriously wrong with your > setup. [...] Undoubtedly. Of course, it remains to be seen what exactly "OS X has been crashing a lot" means to J. Kernel panics? Finder or other processes getting stuck? And so on. > [...] Mac OS X is not supposed to crash *at all.* As in *ever.* C'mon. That's absurd. If, by "supposed", you mean "designed to", well, no OS has ever been designed to crash (to my knowledge). On the contrary, most engineers try to make their software as crash-proof as possible. How well they succeed -- that's another matter. If you mean "shouldn't", then it would make OS X perfect. And well we know that nothing wrought by human hands is ever perfect. (Of course, Steve Jobs may very well be right to believe he's the Second Coming in disguise, but even then my statement would still hold.) Yes, OS X is robust, certainly more robust than previous versions of the Mac OS (of which it is not really a descendant). But it has its bugs, turkeys and warts. Anyway, modern computer engineering is moving away from the idea of trying (probably hopelessly) to prevent systems crashes to designing systems with generous fault tolerance and rapid recovery (cf. Scientific American, June 2003). > [...] as far as system stability goes OS X is a quantum leap above all > other consumer OSes. Nonsense. Palm is a consumer OS -- is Mac OS X to be compared with it? Essentially, there are only two points of comparison: Win XP and Linux. Mac OS X is not "a quantum leap" above either; in fact, in some respects, it is inferior. For instance, it is much more sensitive to (less fault-tolerant of) marginal hardware (e.g., RAM chips, USB devices, etc.) then either. Let's be honest. Mac OS X is not "a quantum leap" above any of its competitors, in any respect. But it does have a combination of features which makes it very attractive to a very small percentage of computer users (myself included). f