On Mar 30, 2004, at 11:12 AM, Eugene Lee wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 09:33:41AM -0600, Steven Rogers wrote: > : > : How can you say that MS has a monopoly on the market when we're > sitting > : here using something else? > > Is this a serious question? Perhaps rhetorical, since the full answer is not really on-topic. You could say that the USPS has a monopoly on letter delivery, because nobody else can do it. If you use monopoly to describe a freely made choice, then it becomes an essentially meaningless term. But my point is more about the general idea that PC users don't actually choose to use PCs, they're somehow trapped or tricked into it. There are plenty of people who explicitly let someone else make the choice for them (e.g. I let my son/niece/etc. pick my computer because they know about those things). But the vast majority of people pick the PC because they *want* it. That's the cold reality that most Mac people don't want to face. The typical PC user will complain about Microsoft and mock the Mac in the same breath. Going on about Microsoft's "monopoly" just reinforces the denial of self responsibility - that someone else is responsible for their crappy computing experience. Certainly, not every person can make the choice in the work environment, but they can still pick their own computers. I've used a Mac at home, even while being the chief software architect for a 100% PC company. So no, I don't engage in the delusion that Microsoft has a "monopoly" on personal computing. SR