> From: Vincent Cayenne <vcayenne at mac.com> > > A touch of flu just in time to spoil my Christmas dinner, so I'm > needlessly Scrooging here: I guess that means I'm playing dear old Tiny Tim ... though it's been quite a while since I was tiny (especially after a fat xmas dinner!) :) > ...except for Apple's raving insanity in naming applications: which > geniuses signed off on the generic "Mail", "Address Book", and > "Pages"? "Mail" and "Address Book" draw their names quite specifically from the need for "newbies" to identify which applications they should use for these purposes. The icons (which are extremely obvious choices to you and me) perform the same function, which is why Apple puts them in the dock by default. > 'Cause out in the > real world, trying to use resources like Google to isolate anything > involving those apps, I find that using the term "Mail.app" or "Address Book.app" in quotes like that gets me the info I need on those two programs. > Several applications have *an* address book, which must be noted as > distinct from *the* Address Book app. Yes, that does sometimes cause confusion, particularly for people transferring from Outlook/Entourage. But it really *is* quite silly for every internet-related app to have it's *own* address book, don't you think? The whole idea behind Apple's implementation is "enter the information ONE TIME and it applies to every (Apple) web app." It's a good idea, if not quite perfected yet. If Entourage would use Apple's Address Book instead of its easily-corrupted own, and if AOL users would transfer their AOL address book into Address Book using AOL Services for Macintosh that would solve 90% of the confusion issues right there. > A conversation about a problem > goes blooey at the "OK, now open Mail" point when the user launches > their browser and goes to the web mail (or opens mail, in another > client). That's a rather dim client IMHO that they're not even aware that there IS a program called Mail on their Dock, but in any event I usually just instruct them to tell me the name of their email client, or if they don't have one, to "click on the Mail icon in the Dock -- the one that looks like a postage stamp." That seems to work well. > I think when the "i" prefix started being made fun of, Steve decided > "OK, we'll just leave it off and see how you like it!". iMust admit that iAgree with your supposition -- that there would be less confusion if Mail were called iMail and Address Book was called iAddress. Problem is that there are already copyrighted apps with those names, not to mention that Safari isn't called iBrowser, so I suppose they decided there's no point in trying to get everything with an "i" in front of it. They seem now to have decided that the only iApps now are part of the iLife suite (except, of course, Garageband). > ** example "multi-application" technique: emailing a bunch of holiday > photos to a family member. This is actually an example of why I *love* Apple's implementation. Since Address Book allows me to "group" selected addresses together, all I have to do to send a photo (or photos) to a group of people is open a new email, drag the picture(s) in and type "Family" in the TO field. Done. > Those who've been helping end users for any length of time are > accustomed to the users' tendency to impart generic terms. It's not > Internet Explorer or Mozilla FireFox, it's "my Internet". It's not > Outlook Express, it's "my email". When these helpers hear Mac users > say "Mail" and "Address Book", they're already leaping into > clarification mode. Yes, it can be confusing, but a little patience and the ability to ask clear, concise questions usually gets you the information you need. In the case of the terminally thick, I suggest installing a VNC server on their computer (with their permission, OF COURSE!) on your next visit -- that way you can "see" what they are doing, or do it yourself remotely if need be (which will show them what to do). Saves a LOT of aggravation. Cheers Chas