I agree but then I supposed they should take that sentence off that link then? What exactly does it mean? On Feb 18, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Scott wrote: > That security update is most likely *not* for the trojan in > question. While Apple can be fairly responsive in regards to > security updates, they're not that fast, especially for something > they deem to be low risk. It would also be packaged as a separate > update. As Norman wrote, the 10.4.5 update has been in the works > for a good while, and would not be rewritten at this late date to > include a fix.