On Thursday, Apr 22, 2004, at 14:38 Canada/Eastern, Eugene Lee wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 12:17:38PM -0400, Alex wrote: > > : [...] I don't like or understand > : Schoenberg or Alban Berg, but that doesn't mean they're no good. > > Resource forks are not transparent to the user, are not portable to > non-Mac platforms, may be irrevocably lost when data is transported to > another Mac through one or more intermediary non-Macs, and belong to a > platform that many pundits argue dominate 5% of the world's computer > population and thus represents 5% of the world's computing experience. And that is going to help me persuade my musicologist friend that "Erwartung" is crap -- how, exactly? > Resource forks are not transparent to the user [...] They're perfectly transparent. The user has no clue they're there (witness Stroller's initial mishap). Wish my windows had that kind of transparency, especially on a nice sunny day like today. > [...] are not portable to > non-Mac platforms, may be irrevocably lost when data is transported to > another Mac through one or more intermediary non-Macs[...] In other words, the rest of the world hasn't yet caught up with the Mac. Oh well, what can you do -- just have patience, trust in progress, and wait. > [...] belong to a > platform that many pundits argue dominate 5% of the world's computer > population and thus represents 5% of the world's computing experience. Maybe yes, and maybe no -- so what? The "mere idea of criticizing the government, of being secure from arbitrary arrest, of having a fair trial (or even a fairish trial, or even a trial at all)" [Robert Conquest] has been the privilege of a tiny minority of human beings for a tiny part of the history of the human race -- and certainly doesn't represent in the least the political experience of the vast majority ('way more than 95%). Does that mean it's bad, and we should be in a rush to give it up? f