--On Friday, July 16, 2004 15:44 -0400 Stephen Jonke <sjj_public at mac.com> wrote: > "open" is dependent on the GUI and will have the same window server > issues as BOMArchiveHelper, because it uses BOMArchiveHelper. Exactly, and I thought you wanted a suggestion that didn't rely on the GUI. Using hdiutil and disk images is another possibility. > Also it's possible the currently logged in user has something other than > BOMArchiveHelper as the default application for .zip files. Good point. > I will try ditto. Works great when its limitations aren't a factor. A minor warning if you're seriously considered about data integrity: When "archive cloning" home directory hierarchies with ditto a few months ago I noticed a peculiar permissions problem with a couple files even though the files appeared to be owned and readable/writable by me. I'm not sure if it was during creation or restoring but the resources forks weren't readable (writable?) but using sudo to create (or restore?) the archives avoided the problem. There's a way files originally created while authenticated will look like they're owned by a non-authenticated user when running non-authenticated, but will appear to be root-owned when authenticated. For instance: % ls -l total 128 -rw-r--r-- 1 me unknown 61636 17 May 19:52 Macintosh HD Report.pdf % sudo ls -l total 128 -rw-r--r-- 1 root unknown 61636 17 May 19:52 Macintosh HD Report.pdf I understand how that can happen but don't have a concise explanation (yet). Just wanted to mention it since I suspect it was the reason behind the resource fork snafu with ditto mentioned above and can have similar permission-related side effects with other programs depending on their authentication context. -sjk