On Jul 7, 2004, at 7:49 pm, William H. Magill wrote: >>> From: Stroller <MacMonster at myrealbox.com> >>> Unix is *horribly* obscure & complex, and for no good reason other >>> than >>> compatibility with legacy systems. > > Untrue. The complexity of Unix has nothing to do with compatibility. > (And you would be amazed at how little compatibility exists with > "legacy systems." When was the last time you used either Pascal or > Lisp, let alone Fortran or Cobol under Unix?) I would regard there to be something inherently legacy about a command-line for which many of the principal tools are still called according to the whims of the authors who conceived them twenty or thirty years ago. Stroller.