On Jul 9, 2004, at 5:45 PM, Stroller wrote: > > On Jul 9, 2004, at 12:44 pm, David Ledger wrote: > >>> From: Stroller <MacMonster at myrealbox.com> >>> Subject: Re: [X-Unix] rsync & ssh >>> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 00:07:21 +0100 >>> >>> On Jul 7, 2004, at 12:07 pm, David Ledger wrote: >>>>> From: Stroller <MacMonster at myrealbox.com> >>>>> Unix is *horribly* obscure & complex, and for no good reason other >>>>> than >>>>> compatibility with legacy systems. >>>> Not sure what you mean here. I can't think of any legacy systems >>>> it's >>>> particularly compatible with. >>> >>> Well, what I mean is basically that Unix stays horribly obscure & >>> complicated in in order to remain compatible with Unix. >> >> So really you're complaining that Unix still exists, and hasn't been >> replaced with a new OS with similar internals and different CLI >> utilities. > > No. I'm not complaining. > Please take those words in the context of the other 300 or so of my > message. > > I wrote a reply to someone confused why SSH was failing. He remarked > that he was having difficulty finding resources to ease the process of > becoming a Unix guru, and my words were intended to encourage him - > most people find learning Unix difficult, and perseverance will pay > off. > > I really don't see the necessity for the length of this branch of the > thread. My reply was intended constructively. > > Stroller. I for one would like to point out that these discussions between several members of this list, whose opinions and commentary I *highly* respect, are greatly enlightening. Thanks for the insight. Seriously. Phil Phil Burk ________________________________________________________ Systems Support Technician Wiley Publishing, Inc. 10475 Crosspoint Blvd Indianapolis, IN 46256 317-572-3049 vox 317-572-1049 fax