On 3/26/04 6:05 PM, "Stroller" <MacMonster at myrealbox.com> wrote: > You're missing an flag. You either need a flag for "hide" (the same as > running the command without a flag) or you need a flag to specify that > the next argument is the app name. Otherwise someone will, eventually, > discover that the command is unable to hide an app named o (or -o, as > the cae may be). I don't agree. I think it's good to make it as simple as possible, so that without a flag you can still do something. I originally wondered if it wouldn't have been good to make it interactive - when you type hide, the shell asks Which application do you want to hide?, then you type the response and press return. Or, when you type hide, you see a list of options, and type a letter, or a letter and app name to hide/show it. Also, it might have been more interesting to make one called hide and another called show, but that gets confusing.... Kirk My latest book: How to Do Everything with Mac OS X Panther http://www.mcelhearn.com/htde.html . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . kirk at mcelhearn.com | http://www.mcelhearn.com . . . . . . . . Kirk McElhearn | Chemin de la Lauze | 05600 Guillestre | France . .