[X-Unix] Why didn't Apple change the line bre ak ?

[Alexandre Gauthier]

peter boardman wrote:

>Is it just me, or are the subject lines of this thread changing subtly?
>
>"[X-Unix] Why didn't Apple change the line break  ?
>Re: [X-Unix] Why didn't Apple change the line bre ak ?
>Re: [X-Unix] Why didn't Apple change the line bre ak ?
>Re: [X-Unix] Why didn't Apple change the line break ?
>Re: [X-Unix] Why didn't App le change the line break ?
>Re: [X-Unix] Why didn't Apple change the line bre ak ?
>Re: [X-Unix] Why didn't Apple change the line bre ak ?
>Re: [X-Unix] Why didn't App le change the line break ?
>Re: [X-Unix] Why didn't App le change the line break ?
>Re: [X-Unix] Why didn't Apple change the line bre ak ?
>Re: [X-Unix] Why didn't Apple change the line bre  ak ?
>Re: [X-Unix] Why didn't Apple change the line bre   ak ?
>Re: [X-Unix] Why didn't Apple change the line bre   ak ?
>Re: [X-Unix] Why didn't Apple change the line break ?
>Re: [X-Unix] Why didn't App le change the line bre ak ?
>Re: [X-Unix] Why didn't Apple change the line bre  ak ?
>
>Is it a secret code? 
>
>Pete
>_______________________________________________
>X-Unix mailing list
>X-Unix at listserver.themacintoshguy.com
>http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/x-unix
>  
>
I was sincerly wondering the same thing... why is that?

-- 
Alexandre Gauthier
supernaut at underwares.org

underwares.org
Obscure IT knowledge Open Database

The human brain operates at only 10% of its capacity. The rest is overhead for the operating system.